Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign. Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and in the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger. 
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am (currently),&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo; 
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term contract with the Heat (or elsewhere). And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign. Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and in the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger. 
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am (currently),&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo; 
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up.
If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term contract with the Heat (or elsewhere). And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign. Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and in the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger. 
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am (currently),&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo; 
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up.
If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal with the Heat (or elsewhere). And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign. Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and in the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger. 
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am (currently),&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo; 
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign.
Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and in the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger. 
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am (currently),&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo; 
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign.
Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger.
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am (currently),&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign.
Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger.
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am [currently],&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me,&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign.
Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger.
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am [currently],&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me,&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none are as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sported six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign.
Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger.
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am [currently],&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me,&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none are as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sporting six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camps are the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Unless you&rsquo;re an NBA junkie, you&rsquo;re excused if you&rsquo;re not familiar with Omer Yurtseven... for now.
Yurtseven is a 24-year-old big man entering his sophomore season in the NBA. He went undrafted in 2020 after playing three college seasons &mdash; two at NC State and one at Georgetown &mdash; but signed an Exhibit 10 contract with Oklahoma City before the 2020-21 season. During that campaign, Yurtseven averaged 15.2 points and 9.3 rebounds in 21.1 minutes per game with the OKC Blue, the Thunder's G League affiliate, and caught the eye of decision-makers at the next level &mdash; particularly in South Beach.
In May 2021, Yurtseven signed a deal with the Miami Heat before the end of the season and inked a standard multi-year contract with the team before the 2021-22 campaign.
Though he hadn't yet secured a significant spot in the Heat's rotation, the rookie big man <a href="https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/y/yurtsom01/gamelog/2022" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stepped up in the winter months</a> when Miami needed him most last year.
His coming out party was on Dec. 26 against the Orlando Magic, a night where he scored 16 points and collected 15 rebounds in 33 minutes &mdash; the first double-double of his career.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Mz4GvzEpRbk" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The momentum only continued from there.
In January 2022, Yurtseven nearly averaged a double-double (10.6 points, 9.9 rebounds) in over 22 minutes per contest. That stretch included a 22-point, 16-board performance in Sacramento, and, most impressively, going toe-to-toe with Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers; Yurtseven produced 22 points and 11 rebounds in a starting role for his eighth double-double in 10 games.
Yurtseven only received spot minutes following that contest, in both the regular season and the playoffs. However, that winter stretch taught him quite a bit about NBA bigs.
&ldquo;Going against bigs like Joel Embiid, [Jusuf] Nurkic &mdash; those heavy hitters taught me that I need to be stronger,&rdquo; Yurtseven told Basketball News in a phone interview. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s the best part about basketball: There is no limit that you can cap yourself on if you keep working and keep believing.
&ldquo;I saw I needed to add strength. But you can&rsquo;t disregard agility because you have to keep up with the skinnier and faster bigs, too. Playing against Embiid, though, I think I made it hard for him and contested shots. But I know I can be stronger.
Yurtseven's highlights are impressive. He moves well without the ball, gets up and down the floor, screens and rebounds well, and demonstrates good moves in the mid-post and around the rim.
His playstyle is a bit of a throwback. Despite knowing that the game is more perimeter-oriented than ever, he only attempted 11 three-pointers last season. Standing 7-foot tall, being an active rebounder and performing at his best when catching the ball on the block, Yurtseven leans on the most natural parts of his game.
When asked about his first NBA season, he relays he learned a lot, and notes that there is still work to be done to improve.
"Last year was basically my rookie year, and that was my first time against Embiid. I had my first start last year, my first double-double," Yurtseven said. "So, this year, it&rsquo;s all something I&rsquo;ve done before. I&rsquo;ll be better prepared knowing what I&rsquo;ll face and knowing the ups and downs.
Looking ahead is a natural part of professional sports, and it&rsquo;s no different for Yurtseven. In speaking to him, it&rsquo;s evident that he&rsquo;s excited about what&rsquo;s to come, and he has set out many goals for himself in the near future. &nbsp;
&ldquo;No. 1 is getting that rotational spot during training camp and throughout the season. In order to do that, I need to be in the best shape I can, which I am [currently],&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Cutting down the body fat and increasing weight, it&rsquo;s been a grind. But it&rsquo;s an everyday thing. I&rsquo;ve been doing it non-stop for four years now.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Yurtseven&rsquo;s success, at least this season, will be predicated on how well the lineups in which he's featured fare. Understanding that each play could impact his future, and that legends like coach Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley are directly involved, would rattle most of us, but Yurtseven isn&rsquo;t the least bit intimidated by it.
&ldquo;[It's] exciting more than anything because every day is a different challenge,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;They demand a lot of you, but that also shows their belief. That&rsquo;s what a lot of players misinterpret. They think, &lsquo;Coach is yelling at me,&rsquo; and [will] be bummed about it. Or, [instead], they can say 'He believes in me and knows and wants that extra edge that he knows I can give him.'"
All NBA teams have strength and conditioning programs, but none are as notorious as Miami&rsquo;s. That program has led to some seriously impressive transformations. (Notably, former guard Dion Waiters, who was in good-but-not great shape before joining the Heat, sporting six-pack abs after landing in Miami.)
And while it involves treacherous preparation, it&rsquo;s all just part of Spoelstra&rsquo;s plan to be better prepared to run than the competition. However, it's Yurtseven&rsquo;s personal training regimen that makes him confident about winning his spot in the Heat's rotation come training camp.
&ldquo;All the coaches have been saying is, 'If you want minutes, come get them in training camp.' So, that&rsquo;s my focus,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no such thing as over-preparation. So, I have to be in the best shape of my life and be ready &mdash; the rest will take care of itself. (The Heat coaching staff) is extremely demanding. Mondays are really tough in camp,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;They know you got a little rest on the weekend. So, you go all out, and it takes everything out of you.&rdquo;
A major part of Miami&rsquo;s training camp is the &ldquo;10's," a timed test that players must pass. It involves running 10 baseline-to-baseline sprints in under a minute.
&ldquo;You do 10's, and before that, you do a lift, conditioning workouts,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Personally, I go for extra vitamin sessions at night, too.&rdquo;
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_17542186_690w.png" alt="" />
Yurtseven is keen to point out that the adage about achieving success through goals and habits is accurate. In doing so, he revealed a lot about the dedication, on and off the court, that&rsquo;s necessary for success.
&ldquo;When you get your body fat percentage down, it gives you another gear. I&rsquo;ve realized that more since I&rsquo;ve dropped body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven explained. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s been amazing to feel that and get closer to [reaching] your potential or maximum speed. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a saying that you can&rsquo;t outwork a bad diet, and it&rsquo;s definitely true. I&rsquo;ve tried it both ways &mdash; I&rsquo;ve tried to outwork a bad diet, and it did not work. You just have to watch what you eat.
&ldquo;I have a chef now who takes care of my nutrition. He adds up my daily protein, carbs, calories, whatever. He knows what I&rsquo;m trying to do, and that helps me control energy levels and stay on top of body fat,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;You see guys like Jimmy [Butler] with very low body fat and you see it in his reaction time, and speed and agility. Everything is more explosive because he doesn&rsquo;t have excess body fat that slows you down.&rdquo;
Dietary concessions are a necessary part of preparing for an NBA season, but those are usually difficult to make. Like the rest of us, Yurtseven struggles with cutting out foods. But he dropped some knowledge on how he approaches clean eating and exactly which foods he avoids.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a long list. I think I have a sweet tooth. And overall, I love eating and trying different foods,&rdquo; Yurtseven said. &ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from, I was introduced to a whole different array of flavors. No. 1, though, is sweets, which I&rsquo;ve had to cut out. There&rsquo;s no end to the amount of calories [that sweets add].
&ldquo;Trail mix, too, because they seem like an innocent snack. But [it&rsquo;s] all sweets: Cookies, ice cream, even cereal. It&rsquo;s just little changes that add up, eliminating 1,000 or more calories per day.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Considering the reputation Miami has for its nightlife, you might imagine that a young and handsomely paid individual like Yurtseven might struggle with that side of the world, too. But fortunately for all involved, that&rsquo;s not a problem for Yurtseven.
&ldquo;The scene is always there. Overall, you have to put the horse blinders on," Yurtseven said. "There&rsquo;s no doubt that alcohol is not good for you, and guys do drink. I don&rsquo;t consume alcohol because of my religious beliefs, but it can make you retain body fat.
&ldquo;The party life can consume so much time and energy that you can otherwise invest in yourself. I think clubs are weird; I&rsquo;ve never been to one in Miami. I&rsquo;m trying to keep that streak going. I just stay in &mdash; play my video games if I need to, [take advantage of] pool time, [go to] the beach. There are a lot of distractions here, and it&rsquo;s a big challenge for anyone who comes here. It&rsquo;s just a sacrifice that you have to have in mind.&rdquo;
Ultimately, Yurtseven just wants to secure that spot with the Heat, though, and his mindset and worth ethic should aid him in securing it.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m a little crazy, too,&rdquo; Yurtseven joked. &ldquo;I always do extra &mdash; extra reps or whatever it is that gives me an edge, I&rsquo;m going for it. The Heat culture is intense, but I&rsquo;m a little crazy (too), so I do more on top of the crazy.
&ldquo;I just have to play [in a strong manner] so they say, 'How can we not play him? He helps us in all these areas.&rsquo; And I will showcase that,&rdquo; Yurtseven continued. &ldquo;Np. 1 is defense, my change in agility, energy and focus; once I show that, it will give them the confidence to trust me and leave me out there, and that opens the door for me to showcase my offensive package.
&ldquo;The goal is having that role where I shoot the ball, rebound the ball, defend, and I&rsquo;m able to showcase my skill set more in the mid-post when I get a catch. Being able to have my go-to moves to shoot a high clip.&rdquo;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Having reached the NBA Finals in 2020, appearing in the playoffs for three straight years and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals last season, the Heat have had their fair share of success.
But Yurtseven hopes the team eclipses all recent outcomes in 2022-23.
&ldquo;One-hundred percent [the goal is a] championship,&rdquo; Yurtseven stated. &ldquo;I think we fell short last year because there were moments when the team needed another guy or two to step up in every area. Sometimes it was offense. Sometimes it was defense. And that&rsquo;s what I think we&rsquo;ll do this year.&rdquo;
Longer term, Yurtseven sees his future in Miami, too. And while many present-day athletes tend to stay mum on the subject of contract negotiations, Yurtseven seems to feel strongly about being with the Heat organization. Still, as an unrestricted free agent after this season concludes, he understands that where he plays is not entirely his decision.
&ldquo;Miami [is] a team that believed in me when a lot of teams did not," Yurtseven said. "And I would love to finish and retire and say that I started my journey here and ended my journey here. But you never know because it is a business.&rdquo;
While the 2022-23 season counts as Yurtseven&rsquo;s sophomore campaign, there&rsquo;s already a make-or-break feel to it, with nowhere to go but up. If he outperforms expectations, Yurtseven could secure a longer-term deal &mdash; with the Heat or elsewhere.
And if that happens, we're all more likely to get familiar with Omer Yurtseven.&nbsp;

Omer Yurtseven could be poised for a breakout season in 2022-23. And if he succeeds, he can thank his "crazy" work ethic.

Omer Yurtseven's 'crazy' work ethic fits perfectly with Heat culture

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to competely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to competely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
&nbsp;
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to competely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to competely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="439" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to competely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="439" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to competely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="439" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to completely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="439" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to completely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an tacful backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="439" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to completely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impactful&nbsp;backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Young players who enter the NBA go through an adjustment period. The competition is highly skilled and uber-athletic, and their lifestyle changes drastically. As a result, it usually takes a season (or two) for top picks to get acclimated.&nbsp;
So, when a top pick suffers a season-ending injury before their rookie campaign begins, it&rsquo;s obviously less than ideal. At best, it costs their team a year of development. At worst, it&rsquo;s an omen of things to come.
The Oklahoma City Thunder&rsquo;s prized rookie, Chet Holmgren, recently suffered a Lisfranc injury to his right foot while defending LeBron James on a fastbreak at The CrawsOver Pro-Am in Seattle. Holmgren doesn't have an alarming injury history, but any seven-footer who weighs less than 200 pounds is going to raise certain red flags.
While we&rsquo;ve yet to see Holmgren compete regularly against NBA players, he certainly looked like the real deal last season at Gonzaga and in this year's Summer League. He&rsquo;s fluid on the offensive end, where he can handle the ball and shoot from just about anywhere. And defensively, Holmgren is a menace. His absurd 7-foot-6 inch wingspan enables him to erase shots that are launched anywhere in his vicinity.
To summarize, Holmgren&rsquo;s injury is a real bummer for everyone involved. Sure, the Thunder will suffer &ndash; and maybe get into the Victor Wembanyama sweepstakes. (Wouldn&rsquo;t that be something?!) But alas, it&rsquo;s always darkest before dawn. Holmgren is not the first lottery pick to miss his entire rookie season, and there are numerous examples of these players returning to their dominant pre-injury form.
While guys like Larry Bird, Jerry Lucas and David Robinson all missed their rookie seasons for non-injury reasons, we're focusing on players who were sidelined after getting hurt. Julius Randle was also left off this list since he technically played 14 minutes prior to his season-ending injury as a rookie.
Let&rsquo;s look back at several high-end lottery picks who had to postpone their NBA debut for a full year.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Joel Embiid
Embiid is the most obvious example. His foot injury cost him his first two seasons in the NBA. He underwent surgery prior to the 2014 NBA Draft and had another surgery on that same foot the following offseason.
The Philadelphia 76ers were patient with Embiid, allowing him to miss the 2014-15 season and 2015-16 season. Once he was healthy, Embiid returned for 31 games in 2016-17, averaging 20.2 points, 7.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game. He also connected on 36.7% of his three-point attempts.
Now, Embiid's injury issues are mostly behind him. He played in 68 games this past season, leading the league in scoring (30.6 points) while also averaging 11.7 rebounds and 1.5 blocks.
While he&rsquo;s suffered a few injuries in recent years, he&rsquo;s been far more durable than expected. Embiid is a five-time All-Star who has been named to four All-NBA teams and three All-Defensive teams.
Blake Griffin
Griffin&rsquo;s pre-rookie-year injury was tough to stomach because he fractured his kneecap in the final preseason game, meaning it wouldn&rsquo;t have happened had he sat out that last exhibition game.
Like Embiid, Griffin hit the ground running once he returned. He was a refreshing mix of power, skill, size and speed not seen since Shawn Kemp or Dominique Wilkins. He averaged 22.5 points and 12.1 rebounds per game in his first NBA season, winning Rookie of the Year and never looking back.
Griffin is a six-time All-Star, and he&rsquo;s been named to five All-NBA teams. He managed to revamp his game after his athleticism dwindled, making an impressive transformation.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_5023976_690w.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="439" />
Ben Simmons
Simmons was the No. 1 pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, and he entered the league with plenty of hype.&nbsp;
Simmons' career got off to a slow start thanks to a broken foot suffered before his rookie season. The nature of Simmons' injury was less concerning than that of Embiid or Griffin. However, the 76ers' fan base was still awaiting the return of Embiid from his pre-rookie-year injury, so they were understandably frustrated when another top prospect was sidelined.
Fortunately for all involved, Simmons came back with a vengeance. He averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.1 rebounds per game in his rookie season, teasing fans with his unique mix of size and speed. While he's yet to completely reach his full potential, Simmons was obviously unaffected by his foot injury. He won Rookie of the Year in 2017-18, and he's now a three-time All-Star.
Nerlens Noel
Before Embiid landed in Philadelphia, there was Noel. Noel was projected to be a top-three pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, but then a collision with the basket cost him the end of his freshman season at Kentucky. Noel was ultimately drafted No. 6 overall by New Orleans, with the understanding that he'd miss a considerable amount of time. Noel was eventually dealt to Philadelphia as part of the Jrue Holiday trade, which was Sam Hinkie's first move in Philadelphia.
Noel rehabbed his torn ACL with the 76ers and missed the 2013-14 campaign. The following year, he returned and played 75 games. While Noel lacked a jump shot, he made an immediate impact, averaging 9.9 points, 8.1 rebounds and 1.9 blocks in 30.8 minutes for the 18-64 76ers.
Noel's career never reached the heights that some hoped, but that has little to do with his ACL injury. He's grown into an impactful&nbsp;backup center, capable of starting for stretches for a playoff-caliber team.&nbsp;
Michael Porter Jr.
After being ranked the top high school player in the country, Porter suffered a back injury that required spinal surgeries in 2017 and 2018. Despite only playing three games at the collegiate level, Porter was still selected No. 14 in the 2018 NBA Draft based on his high-school dominance and potential.
Porter was viewed as a risky selection for the Denver Nuggets. After all, the Los Angeles Clippers' team doctor had <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/how-michael-porter-jr-became-a-star-after-career-ending-diagnosis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">written a report</a> projecting that Porter may never play again.
After missing the entirety of the 2018-19 season, Porter returned the following year and played 55 games. In 2020-21, he had a breakout campaign, averaging 19.0 points, 7.3 rebounds and 2.8 threes per game.
Unfortunately, his back issues would surface again last season, as he needed another back surgery that caused him to miss all but nine games.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Greg Oden
Oden's story is the saddest of the bunch. He was projected by many to be a generational talent. He was taken No. 1 overall in the 2007 NBA Draft, one pick before Kevin Durant.
After one Summer League game, his knees were already a problem. He underwent microfracture surgery on his right knee before the season began. At the time, he was the first No. 1 pick to miss his entire rookie year since David Robinson in 1987.
Oden played in only 105 games across three NBA seasons, suffering season-ending injuries in 2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13. He retired with career averages of 8.0 points and 6.2 rebounds per game.&nbsp;
***
Lottery picks are supposed to play. They are young and vibrant, and they represent hope for a team&rsquo;s future. While incredibly scary, season-ending injuries can be more of a bump in the road than a demolition. Holmgren seems to have a very bright future, so let&rsquo;s hope his injury is more of the former.

Chet Holmgren's season-ending injury is unfortunate, but he's far from the first lottery pick to miss the entirety of his rookie year.

Chet Holmgren isn't the first NBA lottery pick to miss rookie season

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. After being overlooked in recent years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise. But make no mistake about it, Denver&rsquo;s 2022-23 season will be successful. If folks are surprised by that, so be it.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. After being overlooked in recent years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this year.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. After being overlooked, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this year.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. Unlike past seasons, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this year.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. And unlike past years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this season.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
&nbsp;
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. And unlike past years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this season.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
<img src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_18033160_690w.jpg" alt="" />
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. And unlike past years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this season.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_18033160_690w.jpg" alt="" width="602" height="401" />
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. And unlike past years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this season.

Anyone remember the Denver Nuggets? Just a few short seasons ago, they advanced to the Western Conference Finals. They boast the back-to-back MVP winner. They&rsquo;ve won at least 46 games in five consecutive seasons. Anyone?
In all seriousness, the Nuggets have become something of an afterthought &mdash; mainly because they haven't been at full strength in recent years. Lead guard Jamal Murray suffered a knee injury late in the 2020-21 season, which led to most people writing them off. For all remaining optimists out there, a back injury shut down Michael Porter Jr. nine games into last season. The short-handed Nuggets still managed to win 48 games, but they were no match for the Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs.
But despite being overlooked, the future is bright in Denver. If Murray returns and looks like himself, the Nuggets should have more than enough to return to contention. A core of Nikola Jokic, Murray, Porter Jr. and Aaron Gordon is impressive. But in a consistently competitive conference, nothing is guaranteed. So, Denver did what any smart organization would do in their position: round out their roster.
Denver added two key pieces in Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Bruce Brown. Doing so cost them some notable players &mdash; namely, Will Barton and Monte Morris.
First, let's discuss the addition of Caldwell-Pope.&nbsp;
Caldwell-Pope is an accomplished scorer. Last year, in his ninth NBA season, he averaged 13.2 points per game for the Washington Wizards. While Barton was a mediocre three-point shooter, Caldwell-Pope knocked down 39.5% of his three-point attempts last season (and shot 41% from deep the year before). KCP is a significantly better defender too.
Caldwell-Pope looks like a really good fit for this team. He is a prototypical 3-and-D guy, and he's never been a high-usage player. In fact, despite posting the third-highest usage rate of his career in 2021-22, Caldwell-Pope ranked just 105th in the NBA. And still, his impact was felt.
<img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://cdn.basketballnews.com/images/story/body/usatsi_18033160_690w.jpg" alt="" width="602" height="401" />
While Caldwell-Pope may score more points, Brown should make an even greater impact. Like Caldwell-Pope, Brown can be classified as a 3-and-D-type player as well. However, his style and physical attributes make him more difficult to define.
At 6-foot-4, Brown can play all five positions, literally. He creates and distributes, defends on and off the ball and scores in a variety of ways, including at the rim, in transition and on the move without the ball.
Playing with Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving created some unique opportunities in Brooklyn, but Brown could be even better in Denver considering he&rsquo;ll be alongside more willing passers in Jokic and Murray.
Not only can Brown play and defend any position, he also demonstrated his chops as a shooter last season. He connected on 40.4% of his three-point attempts after making only 28% in 2020-21. Brown also shot 66% at the rim and 48% from the short midrange, which ranked in the 62nd and 79th percentile among forwards.
Brown also takes care of the basketball. Despite playing in 72 games last season, there were only five contests in which Brown committed two or more turnovers.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Ultimately, Brown&rsquo;s versatility is his calling card. He can take on some of the scoring burden like Barton did. He can also help fill the void at back-up point guard created by trading Morris. But where Brown really improves Denver is on the defensive end of the floor, and that&rsquo;s something the Nuggets need. Denver ranked 15th in defensive rating in 2021-22 &ndash;&nbsp;the epitome of mediocre in the NBA.
Unlike Caldwell-Pope, who projects to be a starter, Brown will likely help out Denver&rsquo;s second unit. Similar to Gary Payton II, Brown can easily handle tough defensive assignments. And given his aforementioned versatility, he&rsquo;ll be able to sub in for any position.
Brown may end up being one of the biggest steals of this offseason considering the Nuggets got him on a two-year, $13.2 million deal. Sure, that&rsquo;s a relatively short-term contract (and he has a player option in year two), but adding a major rotation player for just $6.6 million per season is a huge win for any team.
An appropriate comparison for Brown is PJ Tucker, who can also play virtually every position and take on most defensive assignments. Adding a young Tucker-esque player at that cost is an absolute bargain. Oh, and Brown is still just 25 years old, meaning he'll probably get even better.
The Nuggets are finally healthy and they've added reinforcements, making them a contender to watch entering this season. And unlike past years, their success shouldn&rsquo;t be a surprise this season.

Denver was already a playoff team in a tough Western Conference. They'll be even better this year thanks to their offseason additions.

Bruce Brown, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope raise the Nuggets' ceiling

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of that matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists that know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks, too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amare Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only 7 of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and the players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists that know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks, too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amare Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only 7 of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and the players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks, too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amare Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only 7 of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and the players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amare Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only 7 of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and the players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amar'e Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only 7 of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and the players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amar'e Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening-night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only seven of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and the players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amar'e Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening-night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only seven of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123,655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amar'e Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening-night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only seven of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123655 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amar'e Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening-night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only seven of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123.6 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.267 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this &mdash; At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Well, it finally happened. The New York Knicks and a top-tier free agent have agreed to terms on a contract.
Barring any shocking, last-minute changes, Jalen Brunson will be the Knicks&rsquo; starting point guard on opening night in 2022-23, as he and the team came to terms on a whopping four-year, $104 million deal.
After entering the NBA following a successful three-year career at Villanova, Brunson was drafted and signed a partially guaranteed four-year, $6.1 million deal with the Dallas Mavericks before the 2018-19 season, meaning this marks his first big payday.
Even though the agreement was just recently announced, the presumed signing has already been scrutinized ad nauseum. And since he signed with New York, it&rsquo;s been even more polarizing.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
In light of this move, let&rsquo;s step back and examine the facts: Brunson signed a big deal that will pay him a lot of money in 2022-23 and beyond. Additional details about salary have not yet been announced, but regardless of the annual breakdown, is a deal like this warranted?
That depends on how you view value.
Objectively, the Knicks probably overpaid, as least in terms of production. In total, 13 point guards were scheduled to be paid more than $26 million next season as of June 30, 2022: Stephen Curry ($48 million), Russell Westbrook ($47 million), Damian Lillard ($42.5 million), Trae Young ($37 million), Luka Doncic ($37 million), Kyrie Irving ($36.9 million), Ben Simmons ($35.4 million), Jamal Murray ($31.6 million), D&rsquo;Angelo Russell ($31.3), Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ($30.9 million), De&rsquo;Aaron Fox ($30.3 million), Chris Paul ($28.4 million) and Kyle Lowry ($28.3 million).
For what it&rsquo;s worth, the players just behind Brunson are Mike Conley ($22.6 million), Malcolm Brogdon ($22.6 million), Terry Rozier ($21.5 million), Fred VanVleet ($21.2 million), Spencer Dinwiddie ($20.1 million), Lonzo Ball ($19.5 million) and Eric Bledsoe ($19.3 million).
Most NBA experts can find a few guys on that list that Brunson is probably better than, including Russell, Brogdon, Rozier, Bledsoe &mdash; and probably Ball too.
Considering that each team is at a different place in its development, it&rsquo;s harder to rank starting point guards. But it&rsquo;s fair to say that there are 11 point guards across the league who the Knicks would prefer over Brunson &mdash; Curry, Doncic, Lillard, Young, Jrue Holiday, Ja Morant, Gilgeous-Alexander, LaMelo Ball, VanVleet, Darius Garland and Cade Cunningham. They might also prefer Dejounte Murray, Paul, Fox and Lowry as well, depending on who you ask.
So, an objective review of production from the point-guard position reveals that Brunson might not be an elite producer, yet. Granted, defining point guards is difficult, so bear with me.
In 2021-22, Brunson was tied for the 16th-highest scoring average among point guards (16.3 points per game). He was also 23rd among the position in assists per game (4.8), 16th in total rebounds per game (3.9) and 25th in Defensive Box Plus-Minus (-0.6).
Brunson&rsquo;s production was matched or bettered by a few point guards making less than he is set to earn, including Cole Anthony (rookie deal), VanVleet ($21.2 million) and Dinwiddie ($20.1 million).
But production is also about opportunity, and Dallas used Brunson in a specific way. The fact of the matter is that Dallas already has its lead guard, and it&rsquo;s a no-brainer when choosing who should be the primary creator between Doncic and Brunson. The idea that Brunson will have more opportunities in New York should be exhilarating to Brunson and his believers.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Welcome to New York, Jalen Brunson! <a href="https://t.co/lISUdlwnOH">pic.twitter.com/lISUdlwnOH</a>
&mdash; Ballislife.com (@Ballislife) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ballislife/status/1542684979204919301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 1, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Further, it&rsquo;s easy to overlook the idea that teams invest in players&rsquo; futures. Sure, most fan bases celebrate signing proven players. But some of the best contracts are those given to players on the verge of breaking out, and that could be precisely where Brunson is in his career.
Brunson&rsquo;s contract was created by optimists who know and love him. Leon Rose, Brunson&rsquo;s former agent, simply believes that giving Brunson the keys to the castle will make him better; the adage of &ldquo;yesterday&rsquo;s price ain&rsquo;t today&rsquo;s price&rdquo; feels eerily relevant. It certainly is for the Mavericks, as they could have signed him for significantly less just a few months ago, and it could be for the Knicks too, if Brunson outperforms this contract.
This deal was also a must-have for the Knicks because not only have they failed to land a major free agent since 2010 &mdash; at which point Amar'e Stoudamire was more of a consolation prize than a home run &mdash; but they&rsquo;ve also been desperate for a starting-caliber point guard for what feels like ever.
Don&rsquo;t believe me? Here&rsquo;s a look at the Knicks&rsquo; opening-night starting point guards for the past 13 seasons: Chris Duhon, Ray Felton, Toney Douglas, Felton (again), Pablo Prigioni, Shane Larkin, Jose Calderon, Derrick Rose, Ramon Sessions, Trey Burke, Allonzo Trier, Elfrid Payton and Kemba Walker.
So, it&rsquo;s been a rough, rough stretch.
But that&rsquo;s not all. Brunson turns 26 in August, meaning he&rsquo;s an ideal match for the Knicks' young core. RJ Barret is just 21, Julius Randle is 27, Mitchell Robinson (a candidate to re-sign in New York) is 23, Obi Toppin is 23 and Immanuel Quickley is 22.
Now, back to that list of higher-paid point guards: Only seven of the 13 point guards set to make $26 million or more next year are under 30 years old.
Knicks fans are fractured over the idea of paying Brunson, but if not him, then who?
This league has proven time and again that market size does not explicitly matter, and the idea that free agents will be intoxicated by all that is New York is a dated concept. Culture and success matter more. And if that&rsquo;s the case, and you choose to forego signing Brunson because it&rsquo;s too much money, you&rsquo;ll be stuck in a chicken-and-the-egg situation pertaining to the team&rsquo;s culture and success for even longer.
And then, there&rsquo;s the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and salary cap to consider. Both the owners and players can technically opt out of the current CBA this December. More importantly, the NBA's television deals expire after the 2024-25 season, and the league is allegedly expecting a &ldquo;huge increase&rdquo; in rights fees, according to ESPN.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
CNBC reported last March that the league will seek a new television contract in the range of $75 billion, up from $24 billion, and league revenue obviously impacts the salary cap. This is relevant because, in 2022-23, the salary cap will be $123.6 million, with the tax level coming in at $150.2 million. Forbes&rsquo; Morten Jensen reported last September that the cap could jump to as much as $171 million by 2025, assuming no cap smoothing after a new rights deal and CBA.
Brunson&rsquo;s deal works out to an average annual salary of $26 million, or 17.3% of the full 2022-23 cap. If it does, in fact, jump to $171 million in 2025-26 (and assuming the Knicks have a team salary of $171 million), Brunson would represent only 15% of the team&rsquo;s cap in the final year of his deal &mdash; and the Knicks will have his Bird rights, allowing them to exceed the cap in re-signing him.
It's worth mentioning that Brunson's deal allegedly has a player option in its final year, meaning he can opt out before 2025-26. But at the very least, an increase in the salary cap in 2025-26 would offset re-signing him to a bigger deal, assuming he deserves one. For reference, Curry accounted for 28% of the Warriors' 2021-22 salary. Not that we're comparing Brunson and Curry, but $26 million per year isn't as harmful as it used to be.&nbsp;
So, as much as it may feel arbitrary, and even irresponsible, to hand out a deal like this to a non-All-Star, I ask you this: At what point should the Knicks give out a big contract? And who would agree to come to New York?
Brunson might not be Curry or Lillard, but he&rsquo;s the best player the Knicks have enticed to join them in a long time. And he might even be better than anyone knows.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

With Jalen Brunson, the Knicks have found their new floor general. Considering the price tag, will he live up to expectations?

What does Jalen Brunson's new contract mean for the New York Knicks?

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robison, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability. And while there is no guarantee it translates consistently for the former 2019 sixth overall pick,&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a 4-year/$54 million extension. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity. He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robison, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability. While there is no guarantee it translates consistently for the former 2019 sixth overall pick,&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a 4-year/$54 million extension. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity. He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robison, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a 4-year/$54 million extension. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity. He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robison, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a 4-year/$54 million extension. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity. He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robison, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a four-year extension worth $54 million. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity. He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robinson, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a four-year extension worth $54 million. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity. He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robinson, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a four-year extension worth $54 million. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest-tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity.
He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount. But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robinson, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a four-year extension worth $54 million. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest-tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity.
He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount.
But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robinson, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a four-year extension worth $54 million. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest-tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity.
He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount.
But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating, according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>. Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The New York Knicks have had ample opportunities to develop young players in the recent past. Yet, somehow, they&rsquo;ve fumbled that opportunity over and over again, and Mitchell Robinson&rsquo;s story doesn&rsquo;t stray too far from that reality.
Robinson entered the pros with a lot of question marks. After ranking as 24/7 Sports&rsquo; best center and the ninth-best player in the 2017 high-school class, Robinson decommitted from Western Kentucky University after a suspension for a violation of team rules and chose to prepare for the NBA instead.
Despite the limited tape on him, Robinson&rsquo;s raw talent was undeniable, and the Knicks selected him with the No. 36 overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft.
Robinson&rsquo;s career began with a good amount of success. In his rookie season, Robinson averaged 7.3 points, 6.4 rebounds and 2.4 blocks in 20.6 minutes per game. In per-36-minute terms, that translated to 12.8 points, 11.2 rebounds and an eye-popping 4.3 blocks, which was obviously promising.
There were some noticeable flaws though. Robinson was fairly injury prone early in his career, and he clearly needed to bulk up, as he was regularly pushed out of position by bigger opponents. In addition, Robinson regularly found himself in foul trouble. In fact, despite his limited playing time, Robinson averaged 3.3 fouls per game in his rookie season, fouling out of eight games. As a sophomore, it was more of the same.
Prior to the 2021-22 campaign, Robinson answered the bell by adding some muscle, which helped him avoid those foul troubles. (Robinson averaged just 2.7 fouls in 25.7 minutes per game this season.)
Robinson&rsquo;s improved frame may have also helped with those aforementioned durability issues. After a rough 2020-21 season in which he played just 31 games, Robinson appeared in 72 games this season and started in all but 10 of them. But teams need more from a starting center than relative durability, and having covered Robinson in New York since he was a rookie, it's obvious that he badly wants to be a starter.
However, one drawback of Robinson bulking up was losing some of his explosiveness. After being regarded as one of the best shot blockers in basketball in his first two years, he has taken a slight step back over the last couple campaigns. After averaging 2.4 and 2.0 blocks per contest in his first two seasons, respectively, he averaged only 1.5 rejections in his third year and 1.8 in his fourth despite playing more minutes.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
There are holes in Robinson&rsquo;s game that must be addressed. Specifically, Robinson has absolutely no jump shot to speak of, and he lacks the ability to stretch the floor, hoisting up zero three-point attempts in his entire four-year career. In fact, this past season alone, Robinson did not attempt a single shot farther away than 10 feet from the basket. Though it doesn't need to be a primary part of his skill set, that can be prohibitive to his team&rsquo;s offensive spacing and continuity.
Robinson enters this offseason as an unrestricted free agent. Ultimately, his future will boil down to which team offers the most money and opportunity. Considering that Robinson has not yet cashed in with a big deal, that&rsquo;s the right way to approach free agency.
But where will he end up?
Unfortunately for Robinson, there are few teams below the salary cap. In total, only five teams &mdash; Detroit, Indiana, Orlando, Portland and San Antonio &mdash; <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/which-nba-teams-have-the-most-cap-space-entering-free-agency" target="_blank" rel="noopener">will have significant cap space</a>. Further, there are other attractive centers who will hit free agency, including <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-deandre-ayton" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deandre Ayton</a> and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-destinations-for-mo-bamba" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mo Bamba</a> (and <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-potential-trade-destinations-for-rudy-gobert" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rudy Gobert</a> could be available on the trade block).
Despite differences in play style, Robinson will probably attract many of the same suitors as Bamba. Compared to Bamba, Robinson is already more established, but Bamba has more upside and he has won over scouts with his shooting ability.&nbsp;
Ultimately, the extension that Robert Williams III signed last summer is probably a good starting point for negotiations. Williams signed a four-year extension worth $54 million. That could seem a tad pricey, but it&rsquo;s probably right around where a deal will land.
One additional note: the Dallas-Houston trade that <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/nba-trade-christian-wood-trade-provides-optionality-for-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-houston-rockets-kristaps-porzingis" target="_blank" rel="noopener">landed Christian Wood in Dallas</a> resulted in one less suitor. The Mavericks were rumored to be interested in Robinson, but the acquisition of Wood fills their hole in the middle.
With that said, let's review the likeliest teams to court Robinson when free agency arrives.
NEW YORK KNICKS 
Robinson has spent all four of his professional seasons with the Knicks, and he&rsquo;s seen all the dysfunction up close. He&rsquo;s played for four different head coaches and, at just 24 years of age, he&rsquo;s somehow the longest-tenured Knick. Still, there&rsquo;s comfort in familiarity.
He&rsquo;s played for Tom Thibodeau for the past two seasons, which means he at least knows and understands what&rsquo;s expected of him. And he finally solidified the starting job in 2021-22, starting 62 of 72 games in which he appeared.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJf1RtcqSs8" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
The Knicks have the inside track on re-signing Robinson, who is clearly their best option at center right now. They can still sign him to a four-year, $48 million deal before June 30. If they don&rsquo;t, they&rsquo;ll be able to exceed that amount.
But exactly how much will New York be comfortable paying considering how far they are from contention?
CHICAGO BULLS 
The Ringer&rsquo;s Kevin O&rsquo;Connor <a href="https://www.theringer.com/nba/2022/6/6/23156358/donovan-mitchell-rumors-jazz-nba-finals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently cited</a> the Bulls' interest in adding either Gobert or Robinson. The thinking here is probably simple: Adding an above-average defensive center will help balance out the team, as Nikola Vucevic was a defensive liability in 2021-22. Of all players who played at least 2,000 minutes in 2021-22, Vucevic recorded the sixth-worth Defensive Rating, according to <a href="https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-defensive-rating-leaders-this-season" target="_blank" rel="noopener">StatMuse</a>.
Robinson could replace Vucevic in the starting lineup, but it's more likely that he would either split big-man duties with Vucevic or that the Bulls would look to move Vucevic. The two could technically play alongside one another in a twin-tower-style lineup, but neither is nimble enough to defend some of the more mobile power forwards.
If Robinson and the Knicks do not reach an agreement before June 30, he&rsquo;ll probably command a deal in the $12-to-$15 million range annually, which is far less money than the five-year, $205 million extension Gobert signed in December 2020. While Gobert is clearly the better player of the two, Robinson would help the Bulls defensively in his own right. If Chicago can offer him a starting job and&nbsp;convince him to go slightly lower at $10.3 million per year with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, it could probably be more attractive than toughing it out in the Big Apple, while the Knicks try to break out of their seemingly endless rebuild.
DETROIT PISTONS 
The Pistons are another team rumored to be interested in Robinson. Joining Detroit could be alluring given the presence of Cade Cunningham, and the team should take another step forward after Thursday&rsquo;s NBA Draft, as the Pistons currently own the fifth overall pick. Most importantly, Robinson would probably cruise into the starting lineup, as the team lacks any valid 7-foot options at the position.
The Pistons are also one of a select few teams with cap space, meaning they could actually sign him without making any other moves. Given the cap space and presumed role he could take on, Detroit might be Robinson&rsquo;s preferred destination.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS 
Like Detroit, Portland has a good deal of cap space. There could also be a vacancy in the Trail Blazers&rsquo; front line given that Jusuf Nurkic will hit free agency, though the reported expectation is that Portland re-signs Nurkic. But if Portland is primed for bigger changes and has second thoughts, it's a move the franchise could make, as the Blazers appear ready to make another run behind star point guard Damian Lillard.
Robinson isn&rsquo;t capable of catapulting a team into contention, but he is more than capable of being the anchor for a team in need of defensive help. In 2021-22, Portland gave up the fourth-most points per game, grabbed the fourth-fewest rebounds per games and blocked the 10th-fewest shots per game.
ORLANDO MAGIC 
Considering the Bamba comparison above, it would be mildly ironic if Robinson lands in Orlando as his replacement, but it could happen. Why? Orlando could opt to not match an offer for Bamba, and/or the organization might just see Robinson as a better player. But remember, the Magic have the first overall pick in the upcoming draft, meaning they could onboard Jabari Smith, Chet Holmgren or Paolo Banchero &mdash; any of whom can be seen as the team&rsquo;s long-term answer in its positionless roster setup.
Robinson is capable of making an impact and finding a long-term home, but he needs to play for a demanding coach who will push him to be the best version of himself.
If he can maximize his talent, he can become one of the better defensive centers in the league. If he doesn&rsquo;t, he&rsquo;ll bounce around the league for the next few seasons.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com. <a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Mitchell Robinson exhibited durability and strength in 2021-22. Drew Maresca looks at possible landing spots for the young center.

Examining potential destinations for Mitchell Robinson

After being offered the job, Kenny Atkinson has decided to he will not become the new Charlotte Hornets' head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear is D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reporteldy remain on the Golden State Warriors coaching staff. He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

After being offered the job, Kenny Atkinson has decided he will not become the new Charlotte Hornets' head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear is D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reporteldy remain on the Golden State Warriors coaching staff. He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and decided he will not become the new Charlotte Hornets' head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear is D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors coaching staff. He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and backed out of his agreement to become the Charlotte Hornets' next head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear is D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors coaching staff. He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and backed out of his agreement to become the Charlotte Hornets' next head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear if D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors' coaching staff. He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and backed out of his agreement to become the Charlotte Hornets' next head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear if D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors' coaching staff. Perhaps winning a championship and the possibility of repeating&nbsp; He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and backed out of his agreement to become the Charlotte Hornets' next head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear if D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors' coaching staff. Perhaps winning a championship and the possibility of running it back made him flip-flop on his decision.
He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the season the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and backed out of his agreement to become the Charlotte Hornets' next head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear if D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors' coaching staff. Perhaps winning a championship and the possibility of running it back made him flip-flop on his decision.
He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Kenny Atkinson has changed his mind and backed out of his agreement to become the Charlotte Hornets' next head coach, according to ESPN's Adrian Wojnarowski.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
ESPN Sources: Kenny Atkinson has decided he won&rsquo;t become the Charlotte Hornets&rsquo; head coach and will remain with Golden State as top assistant. After being offered job during the NBA Finals, further conversations led Atkinson to believe it would be best to remain with Warriors.
&mdash; Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) <a href="https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1538242688654385153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 18, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

About a week after reports suggested that Atkinson and the Hornets reached a four-year agreement, Atkinson officially declined the Hornets' job offer. Charlotte narrowed their search to Atkinson and Mike D'Antoni. It is unclear if D'Antoni is still interested in the position.
Atkinson will reportedly remain on the Golden State Warriors' coaching staff. Perhaps winning a championship and the possibility of running it back made him flip-flop on his decision.
He was the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets for almost four seasons. In that time, he led the Nets to the playoffs once in 2018-19 before stepping down during the following year. In total, Atkinson's record as a head coach is 118-190.&nbsp;&nbsp;

After reports suggested that Atkinson would join Charlotte as its new head coach, he ultimately declined the job offer.

Kenny Atkinson changes mind, passes on Hornets'  head coaching job

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Reviewing the performances of recent defending champs may seem as irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes. For example, the Raptors allowed Kawhi Leonard to walk after winning the 2019 NBA Championship. Granted, that was a unique situation in that Toronto traded for him with an understanding that he would be a free agent following the seasonn and that he preferred to play in California. But we&rsquo;ve seen Boston forgo packaging assets over the past few seasons. Maybe Toronto&rsquo;s leveraged future was a cautionary tale for Danny Ainge and Brad Stevens. Or maybe not that was the plan even before Toronto, as Boston neglected to involve itself in the Leonard sweepstakes.
Regardless, NBA Champions and their front offices have operated in a savvy manner for some time. Considering it&rsquo;s down to just Boston and Golden State, it&rsquo;s incredibly unlikely that we see the winner deviate from that pattern now as both are led by astute front offices.
Regardless whether you appreciate the basketball that's been on display in the NBA Finals so far or not, 28 of the 30 NBA fan bases are already looking ahead to next season. Unfortunatley, there's only so much analysis we can complete before the NBA Draft and free agency. Stay tuned.&nbsp;

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs may seem as irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes. For example, the Raptors allowed Kawhi Leonard to walk after winning the 2019 NBA Championship. Granted, that was a unique situation in that Toronto traded for him with an understanding that he would be a free agent following the seasonn and that he preferred to play in California. But we&rsquo;ve seen Boston forgo packaging assets over the past few seasons. Maybe Toronto&rsquo;s leveraged future was a cautionary tale for Danny Ainge and Brad Stevens. Or maybe not that was the plan even before Toronto, as Boston neglected to involve itself in the Leonard sweepstakes.
Regardless, NBA Champions and their front offices have operated in a savvy manner for some time. Considering it&rsquo;s down to just Boston and Golden State, it&rsquo;s incredibly unlikely that we see the winner deviate from that pattern now as both are led by astute front offices.
Regardless whether you appreciate the basketball that's been on display in the NBA Finals so far or not, 28 of the 30 NBA fan bases are already looking ahead to next season. Unfortunatley, there's only so much analysis we can complete before the NBA Draft and free agency. Stay tuned.&nbsp;

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes. For example, the Raptors allowed Kawhi Leonard to walk after winning the 2019 NBA Championship. Granted, that was a unique situation in that Toronto traded for him with an understanding that he would be a free agent following the seasonn and that he preferred to play in California. But we&rsquo;ve seen Boston forgo packaging assets over the past few seasons. Maybe Toronto&rsquo;s leveraged future was a cautionary tale for Danny Ainge and Brad Stevens. Or maybe not that was the plan even before Toronto, as Boston neglected to involve itself in the Leonard sweepstakes.
Regardless, NBA Champions and their front offices have operated in a savvy manner for some time. Considering it&rsquo;s down to just Boston and Golden State, it&rsquo;s incredibly unlikely that we see the winner deviate from that pattern now as both are led by astute front offices.
Regardless whether you appreciate the basketball that's been on display in the NBA Finals so far or not, 28 of the 30 NBA fan bases are already looking ahead to next season. Unfortunatley, there's only so much analysis we can complete before the NBA Draft and free agency. Stay tuned.&nbsp;

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes.&nbsp;
Regardless, NBA Champions and their front offices have operated in a savvy manner for some time. Considering it&rsquo;s down to just Boston and Golden State, it&rsquo;s incredibly unlikely that we see the winner deviate from that pattern now as both are led by astute front offices.
Regardless whether you appreciate the basketball that's been on display in the NBA Finals so far or not, 28 of the 30 NBA fan bases are already looking ahead to next season. Unfortunatley, there's only so much analysis we can complete before the NBA Draft and free agency. Stay tuned.&nbsp;

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes.&nbsp;
Regardless, NBA Champions and their front offices have operated in a savvy manner for some time. Considering it&rsquo;s down to just Boston and Golden State, it&rsquo;s incredibly unlikely that we see the winner deviate from that pattern now as both are led by astute front offices.

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes.
Regardless, NBA Champions and their front offices have operated in a savvy manner for some time. Considering it&rsquo;s down to just Boston and Golden State, it&rsquo;s incredibly unlikely that we see the winner deviate from that pattern now as both are led by astute front offices.

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important for a number of reasons, most notably because it helps us avoid repeating mistakes.

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important and it's interesting to look back at how teams have responded after achieving their ultimate goal.

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important and it's interesting to look back at how teams have responded after achieving their ultimate goal.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
f

Winning a championship is the ultimate and absolute goal for NBA teams. There is &mdash; obviously &mdash; only one champion crowned each year, and 11 of the 30 NBA teams are still without a title.
But as is the case across all professional sports, the work to win is never-ending, continuing even immediately after securing a championship. And that&rsquo;s because there&rsquo;s always another season coming down the pike.
Since the 2000 NBA Finals, the following 10 teams have won all 22 championships: Los Angeles Lakers (6), San Antonio Spurs (4), Golden State Warriors (3), Miami Heat (3), Boston Celtics (1), Cleveland Cavaliers (1), Dallas Mavericks (1), Detroit Pistons (1), Milwaukee Bucks (1) and Toronto Raptors (1).
With a few exceptions, teams that won multiple championships across the 20+ years since 2000 had slightly different cores for each championship team. So, instead of celebrating championships, continued success requires front offices to almost immediately begin considering tweaks to their roster in order to remain competitive enough to potentially repeat. Front offices know this. And still, it&rsquo;s difficult to execute.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Will either Boston or Golden State be able to defend their title after these NBA Finals? Objectively, Boston is well-positioned to do so. They have Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, Derrick White and Robert Williams III all signed through at least 2023-24, all of whom are young enough to continue playing at their current level.
Golden State is also well-positioned, at least in terms of their contracts. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are signed through at least 2023-24. Draymond Green has a player option, for 2023-24 and Jordan Poole has a team option for 2023-24. Andrew Wiggins is the lone player in limbo, with a contract that runs through only next season. Further, the Warriors have a number of young pieces that they can either keep around for the foreseeable future or package in a deal to land another star, as Jonathan Kuminga, James Wiseman and Moses Moody are still on rookie deals.
But Curry is 34 and Thompson is 32. Green is also 32 and already exhibiting signs of decline in the 2022 NBA Finals. One more successful season is certainly within the realm of possibilities, but next season could just as easily be the campaign that the wheels begin to fall off.
Either way, a look back at how recent defending champions have fared the following season reveals some key findings. First, let&rsquo;s review how each team performed in the season following a championship:
Milwaukee Bucks in 2021-22: 51-31, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Los Angeles Lakers in 2020-21: 42-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-2) to Phoenix Suns
Toronto Raptors in 2019-20: 53-19, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Boston Celtics
Golden State Warriors in 2018-19: 57-25, lost in NBA Finals (4-2) to Toronto Raptors
Golden State Warriors in 2017-18: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland Cavaliers in 2016-17: 51-31, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to Golden State Warriors
Golden State Warriors In 2015-16: 73-9, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to Cleveland Cavaliers
San Antonio Spurs in 2014-15: 55-27, lost in Western Conference first round (4-3) to Los Angeles Clippers
Miami Heat in 2013-14: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-1) to San Antonio Spurs
Miami Heat in 2012-13: 66-16, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. San Antonio Spurs
Dallas Mavericks in 2011-12: 36-30, lost in Western Conference first round (4-0) to OKC Thunder
Los Angeles Lakers in 2010-11: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-0) to Dallas Mavericks
Los Angeles Lakers in 2009-10: 57-25, won NBA championship (4-3) vs. Boston Celtics
Boston Celtics in 2008-09: 62-20, lost in Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Orlando Magic
San Antonio Spurs in 2007-08: 56-26, lost in Western Conference Finals (4-1) to Los Angeles Lakers
Miami Heat in 2006-07: 44-38, lost in Eastern Conference first round (4-0) to Chicago Bulls
San Antonio Spurs in 2005-06: 63-19, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-3) to Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons in 2004-05: 54-28, lost in NBA Finals (4-3) to San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio Spurs in 2003-04: 57-25, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to Los Angeles Lakers
Los Angeles Lakers in 2002-03: 50-32, lost in Western Conference Semifinals (4-2) to San Antonio Spurs
Los Angeles Lakers in 2001-02: 58-24, won NBA championship (4-0) vs. New Jersey Nets
Los Angeles Lakers in 2000-01: 56-26, won NBA championship (4-1) vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Whoever wins this year's NBA championship is most likely to suffer a loss in the Conference Semifinals next season, if recent NBA history is any indication. Seven of the past 22 defending champions were eliminated in playoffs in the following season&rsquo;s second round.
There is also a decent chance that the 2022 NBA Champions will qualify for the 2023 NBA Finals. Since 2000, 10 champions have made it to the NBA Finals in back-to-back seasons &mdash; with five teams repeating (including three times by the Lakers) and five teams proceeding to lose in the Finals.
One thing is fairly certain: It's very rare for a championship team to follow up their title with a poor showing the next season. Only four teams were eliminated in the first round in the season following a championship: the 2020-21 Lakers, 2014-15 Spurs, 2011-12 Mavericks and 2006-07 Heat. Since 2000, every NBA champion has made the playoffs the following season. This trend should continue, as both Boston and Golden State will bring back the majority of their roster and be competitive next year.
Maybe you think reviewing the performances of recent defending champs is irrelevant, as each team has its own idiosyncrasies. Still, history is important and it's interesting to look back at how teams have responded after achieving their ultimate goal.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-1habvwh r-eqz5dr r-11rk87y r-1dye5f7 r-m611by r-13qz1uu">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-eqz5dr r-glunga r-13qz1uu">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-13qz1uu">
<div class="css-1dbjc4n r-eqz5dr r-glunga r-13qz1uu">
<div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Drew Maresca looks back at how NBA champions since 2000 have fared in the following season.

How do NBA champions fare the season after winning a title?

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win, too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was that of legends, as hee recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those, as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks, too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win, too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was that of legends, as hee recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those, as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks, too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was that of legends, as hee recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those, as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks, too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was legendary, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those, as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks, too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was legendary, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks, too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was the stuff of legends, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks, too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was the stuff of legends, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was the stuff of legends, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and grabbing 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was the stuff of legends, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and grabbing 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Bill Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a championship.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

In 75 years of NBA Finals history, there have been only seven 50-point games. In those seven games, the team with the 50-point scorer went 6-1. Further, there have been just 19 30-rebound games, only one of which was done by someone other than Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain (Nate Thurmond), and only 15 15-assist games, 10 of which belong to Magic Johnson.
There have been some truly great Finals performances over the years, so let&rsquo;s identify the five best single-game showings in NBA Finals history:
5. Michael Jordan &ndash; Game 4, 1993 NBA Finals: 55 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists 
Let&rsquo;s kick things off with the GOAT. Jordan&rsquo;s 55-point performance in Game 4 of the 1993 NBA Finals is still tied for the second-highest point total in Finals history. Jordan&rsquo;s NBA Finals dominance is noteworthy, as he is undefeated in the championship series with a career scoring average of 33.6 points per game in his six appearances. But this is easily the most impressive of the bunch. He shot 21-for-37 from the field, failing to connect on just one three-pointer. That didn&rsquo;t slow him down though. In addition to 55 points, Jordan also tallied 8 rebounds and 4 assists in this win.
4. LeBron James &ndash; Game 1, 2018 NBA Finals: 51 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
James&rsquo; 51-point, 8-rebound, 8-assist game is the most controversial on this list, but it absolutely belongs. Yes, James&rsquo; Cavaliers lost the game in overtime, which makes this the lone loss among 50-point NBA Finals performances. The thing is, the odds were stacked against James in this series. First, former teammate Kyrie Irving requested a trade prior to the season, leaving James with less firepower to combat the star-studded Golden State Warriors. Furthermore, this game was the first one back for Kevin Love, who had suffered a concussion late in the Eastern Conference Finals. Still, James willed the Cavaliers into a prime position to go up 1-0 on Golden State shooting 19-for-32 from the floor, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 8 rebounds. Had it not been for a meme-worthy blunder by JR Smith at the end of regulation, Cleveland would have gotten the win too. The Warriors outscored the Cavaliers by 10 in overtime. Still, win or lose, this was one hell of a performance.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RgB5Ub1GNUU" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
3. Walt "Clyde" Frazier &ndash; Game 7, 1970 NBA Finals: 36 points, 19 assists, 7 rebounds
Game 7 of the 1970 NBA Finals is better known as "The Willis Reed Game" because Reed limped to the court during warm-ups and scored the first two baskets of the game. The fact of the matter is that Reed ended the game with only those four points, but someone else really did put the Knicks on their shoulders: Walt Frazier. Frazier&rsquo;s Game 7 performance was the stuff of legends, as he recorded 36 points, 19 assists and 7 rebounds. 1970 pre-dates recorded steals, but Frazier recorded a number of those as well. In total, Frazier scored or assisted on 31 of the Knicks&rsquo; 46 baskets, a preposterous number for a championship-deciding game. Best of all, this game resulted in one of only two Knicks championships, making this one of the most legendary performances ever.
2. Giannis Antetokounmpo &ndash; Game 7, 2021 NBA Finals: 50 points, 14 rebounds, 5 blocks
If you like what James did in 2018, you&rsquo;re going to love this. Antetokounmpo put Milwaukee on his back in the decisive game of the 2021 NBA Finals. He did a little bit of everything, beginning with scoring the basketball. He shot 16-for-25 from the field and 17-for-19 from the free-throw line. He racked up loads of rebounds and blocks too, and he impacted the game in a way I literally haven&rsquo;t seen in my adult life. Say what you will about Antetokounmpo&rsquo;s inability to stretch the floor, but when it clicks for him, he is easily the most dangerous player in the game today.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wHPLeWsAQw4" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
1. Earvin "Magic" Johnson &ndash; Game 6, 1980 NBA Finals: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists 
This one is more famous than Frazier&rsquo;s legendary performance, thanks in part to the work of HBO&rsquo;s Winning Time. Regardless of fame, Johnson&rsquo;s performance in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals is wildly impressive. Johnson, the Lakers&rsquo; point guard, was the team&rsquo;s second-tallest starter for this game. With his teammate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar out due to injury, Johnson played power forward and center for much of the game, even taking a page out of Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s book in connecting on a championship-securing sky hook. In total, Johnson scored 42 points on 14-for-23 shooting. He also made up for Abdul-Jabbar&rsquo;s absence by recording 15 rebounds and 7 assists in this all-around show of dominance. Johnson really did a bit of everything in this game, proving that he was an absolute force to be reckoned with... as a rookie.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MeGy8sWHltw" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
Honorable Mention: Elgin Baylor - Game 5, 1962 NBA Finals: 61 points, 22 rebounds
Baylor holds the record for most points scored in a finals game (61), and if this were at top-10 list, he'd be on it, but he fails to make this list. Yes, scoring 61 points and grabbing 22 rebounds in a Finals game is notable. The thing is, leading rebounders regularly snagged 20 or more rebounds in a game in the 1960s, cheapening that statistic. Case in point, Bill Russell amassed 29 boards in the same game. So, while this was clearly an all-time great performance, it doesn&rsquo;t quite make the cut as Baylor&rsquo;s overall impact wasn&rsquo;t quite on par with the five players listed above him.
Legacies are made in the NBA Finals. Players can cement themselves among the all-time greats with one overwhelmingly impressive showing. But one game only gets you so far.
Ultimately, careers are judged in terms of championships. So, while an exceptionally impressive performance gets a player remembered, it doesn&rsquo;t garner the same level of respect as an all-time great performance that results in a title.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Truly dominant NBA Finals performances are rare. But when you witness one, it's breathtaking. Let's review the five best of all-time.

Ranking the 5 best NBA Finals performances of all-time

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie season, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the draft class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor is clearly lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I&rsquo;d argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie season, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the draft class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor is clearly lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I&rsquo;d argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie season, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the draft class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor is clearly lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I&rsquo;d argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the draft class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor is clearly lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I&rsquo;d argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor is clearly lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I&rsquo;d argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor may be lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I&rsquo;d argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor may be lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I'd argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019). Five of the last 10 first overall picks were traded, too. If DeAndre Ayton is allowed to leave Phoenix this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor may be lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I'd argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019).&nbsp;
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall pick reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor may be lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I'd argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019).&nbsp;
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall picks reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Oklahoma City Thunder came out of last Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the night&rsquo;s runner-up, taking home the No. 2 overall pick.&nbsp;
The Thunder have never received the first-overall pick in their franchise history, which technically goes back to 1967 when they were still the Seattle Supersonics. They have selected second on two occasions though, and both worked out really well (Kevin Durant in 2007 and Gary Payton in 1990).
The Thunder have a war-chest of draft picks in the coming years, but those picks are meaningless if they don&rsquo;t select a franchise-altering talent. Fortunately, the No. 2 pick should provide an opportunity to do so. The 2022 draft class features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects, including Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero. All three have their pros and cons, but adding any of them to the existing core of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Josh Giddey should work out beautifully.
In the 2021 NBA Draft, the Thunder made six selections, but they traded three of those players. They added Giddey (who was named to the 2021-22 All-Rookie Second Team), Tre Mann and Aaron Wiggins &ndash; none of whom are bigs. The Thunder did trade for a seven-footer in the 2020 draft (Aleksej Pokusevski), but he&rsquo;s still extremely raw and is not the same caliber of player as the top-three prospects.
Of course, there is still a lot of work to be done through the scouting process to effectively evaluate all three of this draft's most-coveted prospects, but a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals a murkier history than one might assume. After <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/stories/examining-the-success-of-teams-selecting-first-in-the-nba-draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft</a> last week, let's look at how recent No. 2 overall picks have fared.&nbsp;
2012 NBA Draft: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets
The Hornets bombed with the second pick in 2012. Kidd-Gilchrist had a fine career, averaging 12.3 points and 7.9 rebounds per game across eight seasons in the NBA. The thing is, Bradley Beal was selected third and Damian Lillard was selected fifth, and both of those guys are All-NBA-caliber players annually. Comparatively, that&rsquo;s a huge miss for Charlotte.
Verdict: Failure.
2013 NBA Draft: Victor Oladipo, Orlando Magic
The Cavaliers certainly surprised many of us by picking Anthony Bennett with the first overall pick, but the Magic stuck to the script. Oladipo was universally seen as a top-three player in this draft, and he became the second-best player in the class before knee and quad injuries derailed his career.
As much as injuries have robbed much of what Oladipo was, he is still an intriguing player, and he&rsquo;ll probably command some decent free-agent offers this offseason. Obiously, CJ McCollumn (selected 10th) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (selected 15th) are better players, but neither was being considered by the Magic. Considering that Oladipo is a two-time All-Star, an All-Defensive selection and a one-time All-NBA selection, I&rsquo;d say the Magic did a fine job in picking Oladipo.
Verdict: Success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H5-mCm7rAds" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2014 NBA Draft: Jabari Parker, Milwaukee Bucks
The 2014 draft was a weird one. Neither the first nor the second pick ended up being the best player from this draft class. Andrew Wiggins found a good role, even if he is far less successful than most thought he&rsquo;d be, but Jabari Parker really underwhelmed. Granted, Parker stuck around in the league for eight seasons, including some of the current one, but his career simply never materialized even if it&rsquo;s not his (nor Milwaukee&rsquo;s) fault.
Parker tore his ACL twice. He looked like he was becoming a pretty darn good player (even if he was a defensive liability) before the second ACL injury, averaging 20.1 points and 6.2 rebounds per game in 2016-17. However good Parker could have been, the fact of the matter is that Joel Embiid was intriguing enough as of draft night to be taken one pick later, and that stings.
Verdict: Failure
2015 NBA Draft: D&rsquo;Angelo Russell, Los Angeles Lakers
Here&rsquo;s an instance where a player actually was worth a top-three pick. The problem is that the Lakers had the second pick, and there&rsquo;s a big difference between Karl-Anthony Towns or Devin Booker and Russell. Making matters worse, the Lakers sent Russell to Brooklyn before he matured. His immaturity was part of the reason he was traded, but that doesn&rsquo;t change the fact that the Lakers picked him and moved on very quickly. Russell may or may not end up being a franchise-altering talent, but he hasn&rsquo;t realized his full potential yet, and he clearly won&rsquo;t do so for the Lakers.
Verdict: Failure
2016 NBA Draft: Brandon Ingram, Los Angeles Lakers
Ingram is one of the best No. 2 picks in the last 10 drafts. He&rsquo;s a true number one option on a playoff team, a career 18.5 points-per-game scorer and a one-time All-Star. It&rsquo;s debatable that Jaylen Brown (selected third) and/or Jamal Murray (selected seventh) are as good or better players, but both have played alongside more talented teammates throughout their careers.
Ingram has been the best player on the New Orleans Pelicans for a few years now, and we shouldn&rsquo;t take for granted the fact that Ingram led a playoff team this season. Sure, the Lakers didn&rsquo;t cash in on him specifically, but he was part of the package that led to Anthony Davis landing in Los Angeles. So, it worked out for them too.
Verdict: Success
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
2017 NBA Draft: Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers picked second overall again in 2017. They weren&rsquo;t as successful this time around. First, there&rsquo;s Jayson Tatum to consider. Tatum was selected third and is the best player in the 2017 draft class. Being selected by the Lakers wouldn&rsquo;t have changed that, and that should be enough. But there&rsquo;s also Ball&rsquo;s rough shooting mechanics to consider. Sure, he&rsquo;s grown into a good shooter, but the Lakers didn&rsquo;t benefit from that. It&rsquo;s hard to categorize Ball&rsquo;s selection as an outright failure because like Ingram, he helped facilitate Davis to the Lakers. Still, it's tough to classify his selection a success.
Verdict: Push
2018 NBA Draft: Marvin Bagley III, Sacramento Kings
Bagley might be the worst second pick in the last 10 years. The 2018 NBA Draft will forever be remembered as the Luka Doncic class. The Kings could have drafted Doncic, as he was still on the board, but they chose to go with Bagley instead. Bagley isn&rsquo;t even on the Kings any longer, and his time in Sacramento was not memorable.
Bagley is a sub-par defender and three-point shooter. He&rsquo;s scored the ball at a decent pace, averaging 19.5 points per-36 minutes, but he&rsquo;s never earned a big enough role to demonstrate what he can really do, and he&rsquo;s exclusively been on losing teams. Comparatively, Doncic and Trae Young (selected No. 5 in 2018) have turned their franchises around.
Verdict: Failure
2019 NBA Draft: Ja Morant, Memphis Grizzlies
Ingram was the best second pick in the last 10 years, until 2019. Morant stole that made-up accolade almost immediately in his rookie season. The thing is, the 2019 NBA Draft was supposed to be all about Zion Williamson. However, unlike Williamson, Morant has backed up all the hype and then some. So, while Williamson has dealt with injuries for much of his young career, Morant has brazenly become the face of his draft class.
Morant is drawing comparisons to numerous superstars, and he was named to the 2021-22 All-NBA Second Team. No one selected after him comes close to making the Grizzlies think twice about their decision.
Verdict: HUGE success
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/928PEn9h-J0" width="100%" height="325" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
2020 NBA Draft: James Wiseman, Golden State Warriors
Unlike his brother Lonzo, LaMelo Ball was deserving of the second pick in 2020. Instead, the Golden State Warriors went with James Wiseman, though the logic behind the pick is clear, even in retrospect. The Warriors already had two All-NBA guards. The thing is, Jordan Poole looks pretty good alongside Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, doesn&rsquo;t he? So, it&rsquo;s feasible to assume that Ball would have fit too.
After two seasons, Ball is a significantly better player, but he&rsquo;s also had plenty of opportunity to demonstrate that fact. Wiseman has had terrible health-related luck. He played in 39 of the Warriors' first 53 games in 2020-21, but he tore his meniscus in Golden State&rsquo;s 53rd&nbsp;game of the season and hasn&rsquo;t been seen since. Wiseman could still be a serious contributor, as his per-36 numbers were impressive for a rookie (19.3 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.6 blocks and 1.1 assists on .542/.316/.628 shooting). This is one we&rsquo;ll have to continue monitoring.
Verdict: Unclear
2021 NBA Draft: Jalen Green, Houston Rockets
Basing the success of a pick on only a rookie season is tough. Green posted an impressive rookie campaign, but his defensive deficiencies were clear. That&rsquo;s an understandable flaw for a rookie. Green was the assumed second-best player in the class. Having the luxury of hindsight, we now know that Scottie Barnes (selected fourth) and Evan Mobley (selected third) translated to the NBA incredibly well. But wing scorers have a tougher time making the jump, as they must shoot deeper three-pointers and compete against far more athletic competition. Green&rsquo;s floor may be lower than that of Barnes and Mobley, but I'd argue that his ceiling is still higher. Let&rsquo;s give him a little more time.
Verdict: Unclear&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the second overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just three times (2013, 2016 and 2019).&nbsp;
A deeper examination of No. 2 overall picks reveals a limited number of franchise-altering talents. For every Kevin Durant, Jason Kidd, Gary Payton, Earl Monroe and Bill Russell, there are a number of players who didn't live up to expectations. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 2 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction. Either way, No. 2 hasn&rsquo;t produced as many all-time greats as you might expect, but there have been quite a few significant contributors.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Oklahoma City will pick No. 2 in the 2022 draft. A look back at the last 10 drafts reveals that there are no guarantees for No. 2 picks.

Examining the success of teams selecting No. 2 in the NBA Draft

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the lasts 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class only four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded, too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
My takeaway on having the first overall pick is that the options you&rsquo;re afforded in procuring the selection aren&rsquo;t worth the pressure of succeeding. Teams either overthink selections or take the obvious player, and neither scenario plays out well 100% of the time. Sometimes, it's better to have the second pick, which I'll examine in the near future.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class only four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded, too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
My takeaway on having the first overall pick is that the options you&rsquo;re afforded in procuring the selection aren&rsquo;t worth the pressure of succeeding. Teams either overthink selections or take the obvious player, and neither scenario plays out well 100% of the time. Sometimes, it's better to have the second pick, which I'll examine in the near future.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
My takeaway on having the first overall pick is that the options you&rsquo;re afforded in procuring the selection aren&rsquo;t worth the pressure of succeeding. Teams either overthink selections or take the obvious player, and neither scenario plays out well 100% of the time. Sometimes, it's better to have the second pick, which I'll examine in the near future.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
My takeaway on having the first overall pick is that the options you&rsquo;re afforded in procuring the selection aren&rsquo;t worth the pressure of succeeding. Teams either overthink the selections or take the obvious player, and neither scenario plays out well 100% of the time. Sometimes, it's better to have the second pick, which I'll examine in the near future.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
My takeaway on having the first overall pick is that the options you&rsquo;re afforded in procuring the selection aren&rsquo;t worth the pressure of succeeding. It's not the home-run selection that it's often made out to be.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
For every franchise-changing No. 1 overall pick, there are a handful of players who didn't work out in the long run. It's not the home-run selection that it's often made out to be.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
For every franchise-changing No. 1 overall pick, there are a handful of players who didn't work out in the long run. While&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
For every franchise-changing No. 1 overall pick - such as LeBron James, Shaquille O'Neal, Tim Duncan, Magic Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar there are a handful of players who didn't work out in the long run. While&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
For every franchise-changing No. 1 overall pick &mdash; such as LeBron James, Shaquille O'Neal, Tim Duncan, Magic Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar &mdash; there are a handful of players who didn't work out in the long run. Sometimes, the team picking No. 1 overall&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday&rsquo;s NBA Draft Lottery as the big winners, winning the No. 1 overall pick for the fourth time in franchise history.
Winning the lottery is a big deal for any team, as it gives them a tremendous opportunity to add an elite young talent. The <a href="https://www.basketballnews.com/draft" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2022 draft class</a> features a few &ldquo;can&rsquo;t-miss&rdquo; prospects who have already adequately separated themselves from the other top youngsters. Auburn&rsquo;s Jabari Smith, Gonzaga&rsquo;s Chet Holmgren and Duke&rsquo;s Paolo Banchero are easily the most electrifying players in the 2022 class.
All three of these prospects are versatile big men, which is a role that the Magic would be well-served in addressing. Orlando had two lottery picks in 2021, which they used on Gonzaga point guard Jalen Suggs and Michigan small forward Franz Wagner. If the Magic add a big man who grows into a superstar, their roster will be mostly set for the foreseeable future.
Of course, the allure of prospects wears off almost immediately after the draft. Ignoring the scouting process and all the work that goes into prosect evaluation, a look back at the last 10 NBA drafts reveals that first-overall picks are far from the sure things we make them out to be:
2012 NBA Draft: Anthony Davis, New Orleans Pelicans
Ten years ago, the New Orleans Pelicans selected Anthony Davis with the No. 1 pick. Davis grew into a superstar quickly, and his impact on the Pelicans was clear almost immediately. He led the Pelicans to the playoffs twice, in 2014-15 and 2017-18. The 2017-18 team was particularly good, winning 48 games in the regular season with a core of Davis, DeMarcus Cousins and Jrue Holiday. Cousins&rsquo; injury played a major role in Davis departing the Pelicans, as New Orleans failed to replace Davis&rsquo; friend and running mate. Had Cousins stayed healthy, who knows how good New Orleans could have been?
Still, Davis is clearly a great player who was absolutely worthy of the No. 1 pick. He has become an eight-time All-Star and earned a spot on the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team. Davis helped the Los Angeles Lakers win a championship in 2020, and he has career averages 23.8 points, 10.2 rebounds 2.3 assists, 2.3 blocks and 1.4 steals.
Verdict: Success, although not necessarily for New Orleans.
2013 NBA Draft: Anthony Bennett, Cleveland Cavaliers 2014 NBA Draft: Andrew Wiggins, Cleveland Cavaliers 
The Cleveland Cavaliers picked first overall in 2013 and 2014. The strange thing about both picks is that neither Anthony Bennett nor Andrew Wiggins made an impact in Cleveland. Both were sent to Minnesota in a package for Kevin Love. Bennett played one uneventful season with the Cavaliers, and Wiggins was sent out prior to the start of his rookie season. So, which team do we assess? Cleveland or Minnesota? Let&rsquo;s review both.
Technically, getting two consecutive first overall picks and trading them to the Timberwolves helped Cleveland win their first championship in franchise history. That&rsquo;s a big win for the Cavaliers, even if it cost them both players. Cleveland&rsquo;s championship was more so a product of LeBron James (and Kyrie Irving to a lesser extent), but Love was impactful and the trade worked out.
Conversely, Minnesota did not fare well with Wiggins and Bennett. They qualified for the playoffs only once in Wiggins&rsquo; five-and-a-half seasons in Minnesota, and Bennett was off the team after only one season. Wiggins seems to have found a home in Golden State, but he's the team&rsquo;s fourth-best player, which is not what most people expect from No. 1 picks (especially one with Wiggins' hype).
Verdict: Both are failures relative to expectations, but Wiggins has become a significant contributor.
2015 NBA Draft: Karl-Anthony Towns, Minnesota Timberwolves
Speaking of Minnesota, they fared so poorly following the aforementioned Love-for-Wiggins-and-Bennett trade that they received the No. 1 overall pick in 2015. Yes, that means they technically had the first overall picks from three consecutive drafts on their roster, at least for a short period of time.
The pick in 2015 turned out to be Karl-Anthony Towns, who has now played seven seasons in Minnesota. Until recently, the Timberwolves' front office failed to surround him with the talent needed to compete. Towns has led Minnesota to the playoffs only twice, but regardless how one views the lack of team success, Towns was a good pick. He's a career 20-and-10 guy who shoots an unbelievable 40% from three-point range. The 26-year-old is a perfect big man for today's NBA.
Verdict: The Towns pick is a relative success.
2016 NBA Draft: Ben Simmons, Philadelphia 76ers 2017 NBA Draft: Markelle Fultz, Philadelphia 76ers
We can&rsquo;t really discuss the first overall picks of the past 10 seasons without diving into Sam Hinke&rsquo;s Philadelphia 76ers. Hinke led the &ldquo;Trust the Process&rdquo; 76ers from 2013-2016, during which time he received significant scorn from the NBA, media and basketball purists who felt he was cheapening the game by blatantly losing to increase the odds of being awarded the first overall pick.
Thoughts on Hinke&rsquo;s philosophy aside, he picked first overall in two consecutive seasons. Philadelphia won the draft lottery in 2016, selecting Ben Simmons. Then, they traded up to No. 1 overall in 2017 to nab the rights to Markelle Fultz.
Neither Simmons nor Fultz fulfilled their potential in Philadelphia. Fultz had a misdiagnosed shoulder injury, which resulted in an awkward shooting motion. After two sub-par seasons in Philadelphia, he was traded to Orlando, where he&rsquo;s played better but still nowhere near what's expected from a No. 1 pick.
Simmons was better for the 76ers, co-leading them to the playoffs in four consecutive seasons. But Simmons&rsquo; time in Philadelphia ended infamously last season, culminating with him forcing his way to Brooklyn after a lengthy holdout.
Verdict: Degrees of failure, though Fultz was considerably more disappointing than Simmons. At least Simmons became a three-time All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year runner-up.
2018 NBA Draft: Deandre Ayton, Phoenix Suns
The Phoenix Suns picked first in the 2018 NBA Draft, which is another strange case. Objectively, Deandre Ayton is a major piece on Phoenix&rsquo;s roster. In his fourth NBA season, he averaged an impressive 17.2 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.
Can we really analyze players in a vacuum though? Ayton was picked a few selections before Luka Doncic, who received serious first-overall-pick buzz that June. Imagine if the Suns had paired Doncic with Devin Booker? Like the Rockets and Trail Blazers both did in 1984, the Suns simply overthought this one.
2018 is too recent to accurately judge the long-term impact of this pick. Ayton could very possibly end up being a major contributor on a championship team. Still, this is a push at best, and if he ends up signing elsewhere this offseason, that makes the Ayton selection look even worse.
Verdict: Who the hell knows?
2019 NBA Draft: Zion Williamson, New Orleans Pelicans
New Orleans also picked first overall in 2019, selecting the electric athlete, Zion Williamson, who is the toughest first pick to grade in the last 10 years. In his lone injury-free season, he averaged 27 points and 7.2 rebounds per game while shooting 62% on two-point attempts.
But injuries make it far more difficult to grade him. Williamson has played in only 85 of a possible 202 career games, missing the entire 2021-22 season.
Verdict: Time will tell.
2020 NBA Draft: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota is experiencing a major resurgence, and the credit belongs to Towns and the 2020 first overall pick Anthony Edwards. Edwards had a good rookie season, but he exploded in his sophomore campaign.
This season, he helped lead Minnesota to the playoffs, averaging 21.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.0 threes and 1.5 steals on 44.1/35.7/78.6 shooting splits. In the postseason, he took his game to another level, contributing 25.2 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.0 assists, 3.8 threes, 1.2 steals and 1.2 blocks on 45.5/40.4/82.4 shooting splits.
Verdict: After only two seasons, Edwards looks like a huge win for Minnesota.
2021 NBA Draft: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
Last but not least, the Detroit Pistons selected Cade Cunningham first overall in 2021. Despite playing alongside less talent than most of his peers, Cunningham's rookie campaign was successful. He averaged 17.4 points, 5.6 assists and 5.5 rebounds, was named a unanimous All-Rookie First Team selection and placed third in Rookie of the Year voting.
One season is too small of a sample size to grade a young player, but Cunningham looks like the absolute right pick.
Verdict: Success (so far).&nbsp; &nbsp;
In the last 10 drafts, the first overall pick has clearly been one of the best players in the draft class just four times (2012, 2015, 2020 and 2021). He has been a complete dud twice (2013 and 2017), a good player twice (2014 and 2018), a malcontent once (2016) and an injury-prone player once (2019). Five of the last 10 first picks were traded too. If Ayton is allowed to leave this offseason, then six of the last 10 are no longer with the team that drafted them, erasing the benefit of player development.
For every franchise-changing No. 1 overall pick &mdash; such as LeBron James, Shaquille O'Neal, Tim Duncan, Magic Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar &mdash; there are a handful of players who didn't work out in the long run. Sometimes, there isn't a generational player on the board; other times, the team picking No. 1 overall just overthinks it or goes in the wrong direction.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

The Orlando Magic came out of Tuesday’s NBA Draft lottery with the first overall pick. How successful does history suggest they will be?

Examining the success of teams selecting No. 1 in the NBA Draft

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2013-14, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2015-16 an the champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round. So, three of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions and one failed to defeat the best regular-season team ever.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2013-14, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 an the champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 202. So, three of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions and one failed to defeat the best regular-season team ever.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 an the champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 202. So, three of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions and one failed to defeat the best regular-season team ever.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 202. So, three of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions and one failed to defeat the best regular-season team ever.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 2020. So, two of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions and one failed to defeat the best regular-season team ever.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 2020. So, four of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions and one failed to defeat the best regular-season team ever.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 2020. So, four of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions or the dynastic Warriors
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to theGolden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 2020. So, four of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions or the dynastic Warriors.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2018-19. They ultimately lost to the Golden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 2020. So, four of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions or the dynastic Warriors.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Objectively, Damian Lillard is as accomplished as nearly anyone in the NBA, but the legacies of all-time greats are judged against other all-time greats. Shaquille O&rsquo;Neal teases Charles Barkley on "Inside the NBA" about having won zero championships because he can. Win one, and you&rsquo;re forever a member of the club. Fail to do so, and you&rsquo;ll remain on the outside looking in.
Granted, being an all-time great is a good club to be a part of, but failing to win a championship can be utterly haunting. Just watch players like Barkley and Patrick Ewing talk about failing to win on the biggest stage. You hear regret in their voices. And pain. And there&rsquo;s nothing they can do about it.
It&rsquo;s premature to lump Lillard in with the aforementioned greats. After all, he&rsquo;s still only 31, meaning he has years remaining before we can have an honest discussion about his place amongst league legends (with or without a championship). I&rsquo;ll happily wait until he&rsquo;s retired to assess his legacy.
What I will address now is the fact that Lillard&rsquo;s inability to deliver a championship to Portland in his 10 seasons is actually not his fault. In fact, I posit that that no superstar in recent memory can be blamed less than Lillard for his team&rsquo;s shortcomings. Lillard has faced a grueling uphill battle since joining the Trail Blazers as a rookie, and his presence has resulted in Portland consistently outperforming their talent.
First, let&rsquo;s inventory how Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have fared in the postseason. In total, Portland has missed the playoffs twice since Lillard was drafted: once during his rookie year and again in 2021-22, a season in which Lillard was shut down in late December due to abdominal surgery. Had Lillard been healthy all season, his Blazers may have made their ninth consecutive postseason appearance.
Once there, Lillard is an impactful postseason player, posting 25.7 points and 6.2 assists per game in 12 career postseason series. Across his playoff career, he&rsquo;s shot 41.2% from the field, 36.9% on threes and 88.7% on free throws. He&rsquo;s also had several epic shots that were either game-winners or series-enders, which probably inspired Robert Horry, an all-time great shooter himself, to recently refer to Lillard the best clutch shooter ever.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-theme="dark">
Robert Horry calls Damian Lillard the best clutch shooter ever over Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant &ldquo;He has hit a clutch shot versus every team in the NBA.&rdquo;<a href="https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB">https://t.co/lg34EjTZNB</a>
&mdash; NBACentral (@TheNBACentral) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1525203234650050562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2022</a></blockquote>

<script src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>

Despite his heroics, Lillard&rsquo;s Trail Blazers have never reached the NBA Finals. They did succeed in reaching the Western Conference Finals once in 2019. They ultimately lost to the Golden State Warriors. They also lost to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2014, the 73-9 Warriors in the Western Conference Semifinals in 2016 and the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers in the first-round in 2020. So, four of Lillard&rsquo;s eight postseason appearances ended against either the eventual champions or the dynastic Warriors.
Like Barkley and Ewing before him, Lillard has been a victim of time and circumstance, as his prime fell right in the middle of the Golden State Warriors&rsquo; historic run. But in Lillard&rsquo;s case, his struggles have been about more than his opponents. After all, Lillard is not dominated by any one player like how Jordan dominated his era. His circumstances are more a result of his supporting cast, or lack thereof.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Lillard&rsquo;s stance on recruiting is that he wants to remain in Portland. He&rsquo;ll assist in recruiting free agents to Rip City, but he will not entertain recruiting pitches from other teams&rsquo; stars, a fair and respectable stance. For whatever reason, Lillard has been unsuccessful in recruiting others thus far. For example, he failed to land Kelly Oubre in Portland just last summer. However, there are limited examples of a dedicated push by Lillard in recruiting. Whether he foregoes recruiting or fails at it , the result is the same, and it hurts.
But as much as Lillard could participate in team building, there is a management team that is paid a handsome salary to build the team into a legitimate contender, regardless of Lillard's recruitment style. Frankly, that front office has failed to surround Lillard with top-tier co-stars.
A quick inventory of recent NBA champions reveals that Portland&rsquo;s talent is simply insufficient. Seven of the last 10 champions had multiple All-Stars. The other three were San Antonio in 2014, Cleveland in 2016 and Milwaukee in 2021, and we know all three teams had far more talent than any Portland team. Comparatively, battling all-time great competition, Lillard&rsquo;s only active All-Star teammate has been LaMarcus Aldridge, and they only overlapped as All-Stars twice.
There is also CJ McCollum, who was the 2015-16 Most Improved Player. Despite not being named to an All-Star team, he&rsquo;s certainly been an All-Star caliber player for much of his career. He&rsquo;s even (slightly) better in the playoffs, where he&rsquo;s scored 20.2 points, 4.4 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game in 13 series.
McCollum's and Aldridge&rsquo;s better seasons sadly didn&rsquo;t overlap. Aldridge&rsquo;s final season in Portland (2014-15) was McCollum&rsquo;s sophomore season, and McCollum wasn&rsquo;t yet the McCollum we've come to know.
Portland could be on to something now. Anfernee Simons could prove to be a valid backcourt mate for Lillard. The former IMG star had a breakout season last year, averaging 17.3 points per game on 40.9% on three-pointers. If Joe Ingles can regain his pre-injury form and Jusuf Nurkic can remain healthy, there are some promising pieces in the mix.
However, the Trail Blazers still need at least one more creator. Fortunately, Portland has a 37.2% chance of sneaking into the top-four in this year&rsquo;s NBA Draft. Doing so would equip them with a valuable trade chip that could deliver exactly the type of player they need and maybe get them closer to becoming NBA Champions.
Regardless as to what happens with Portland in the immediate future, a closer look at Lillard's body of work reveals just how great he really is. Soon, he may join that elusive and exclusive championship club, but even if he doesn&rsquo;t, we should be careful how we refer to his failures. Because more so than practically anyone in NBA history, not winning a championship shouldn't paint our perception of Lillard.&nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Damian Lillard is already an all-time great. We can't ignore his postseason failures, but he can't be defined by them, either.

Damian Lillard's inability to win isn't his fault

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 season.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which probably contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz*
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
Specifically, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This Spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which probably contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz*
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
Specifically, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This Spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which probably contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz*
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
Specifically, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This Spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as three of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as two of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas, Boston went up 2-0 against Milwaukee and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as two of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks, Bucks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Losing the first game of a playoff series does not inevitably damn a team&rsquo;s chances of advancing. Even for teams with home court advantage, a 0-1 deficit can be easily overcome. But losing the first two games of a series is far less surmountable. At least, that's what recent history tells us. &nbsp;
The idea that one cannot predict the future by examining the past is well established in all walks of life. Still, it&rsquo;s nearly impossible not to use recent trends to reach conclusions and takeaways. So, what does the recent past tell us about going down 0-2 0 in a playoff series?
Keep in mind, the entire history of the NBA isn&rsquo;t relevant since the first round expanded from five to seven games starting in 2003. Examining first-round matchups before that is pointless given that two victories was previously two-thirds of the way to a series victory and now is only the halfway point.
Further, this is a relatively arbitrary analysis. For simplicity&rsquo;s sake, we&rsquo;ll restrict our sample to the past 10 seasons.
Between 2012 and 2021, teams are 12-77 when going down 0-2 in a postseason series, good for a measly .125 winning percentage. 2021 was easily the most competitive for teams down 0-2. Nine teams found themselves in a 2-0 hole in 2021, with five emerging victorious.
Comparatively, teams up 2-0 were undefeated in 2020, 2015 and 2014, going 15-0 across the three playoffs. It&rsquo;s worth pointing out that the COVID-19 pandemic led to the 2020 NBA Playoffs being played at a neutral site with no fans in attendance, which may have contributed to no teams blowing 2-0 leads that season. &nbsp;
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Here&rsquo;s a look at the 12 teams who came back from 0-2 deficits and the teams they did so against in the past 10 playoffs:
2021
First Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Dallas Mavericks
Second Round
Los Angeles Clippers came back to beat the Utah Jazz
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Brooklyn Nets
Phoenix Suns came back to beat the Denver Nuggets
NBA Finals
Milwaukee Bucks came back to beat the Phoenix Suns
2019 
Conference Finals 
Toronto Raptors came back to beat the Milwaukee Bucks
2018 &nbsp;
Conference Finals 
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Boston Celtics
2017 &nbsp;
First Round
Boston Celtics came back to beat the Chicago Bulls
2016 
First Round
Portland Trail Blazers came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
NBA Finals
Cleveland Cavaliers came back to beat the Golden State Warriors&nbsp;
2013
First Round 
Memphis Grizzlies came back to beat the Los Angeles Clippers
2012
Conference Finals
Oklahoma City Thunder came back to beat the San Antonio Spurs
To summarize, in the last 10 playoffs, teams came back from 0-2 four times in the first round, three times in the Conference Semifinals, three times in the Conference Finals and twice in the NBA Finals.
Generally, teams do no overcome a two-game deficit when they&rsquo;ve lost the first two games of a series at home. It&rsquo;s markedly more difficult to win four out of five games when only two will be on your home floor. This is reinforced by recent history, as only two teams &ndash; the Los Angeles Clippers in 2021 and the Boston Celtics in 2017 &ndash; have recovered to a win a series after losing the first two games at home. For what it&rsquo;s worth, both of those occurrences happened in the first round.
This spring, NBA teams were 4-0 in the first round of the 2022 NBA Playoffs when winning the first two games of a series.
This is quite applicable at present, as two of the four current series began with a 2-0 lead. Specifically, Phoenix went up 2-0 against Dallas and Miami went up 2-0 against Philadelphia.
None of the teams that began the Conference Semifinals down 0-2 were the higher seed, meaning that none are in the unfavorable position of needing to overcome a two-game deficit and playing three of the final five games on the road.
Teams will always regurgitate meaningless jargon when down 2-0. &ldquo;We just have to win the next one.&rdquo; &ldquo;One game at a time.&rdquo; &ldquo;No different than any other game.&rdquo; But we know that&rsquo;s false, and history backs that&rsquo;s up. So, best of luck to all you Mavericks and 76ers fans out there, but it&rsquo;s a difficult road back from 0-2 whether you look to history as a guide or not.
<div class="mceNonEditable"><spike>&nbsp;</spike></div>
Looking to go to the hottest concerts, sports, theater &amp; family shows near you? Get 100% guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of BasketballNews.com.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ticketsmarter.com/?utm_source=basketballnewscom&amp;utm_medium=tsaff&amp;utm_campaign=referral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Order online now</a>!

Coming back to win a series from an 0-2 deficit is seen as difficult. Recent history tells us that it's even less common than you'd think.

Examining the recent history of NBA teams coming back from 0-2

Drew Maresca is a New York-area writer. He has worked for Basketball Insiders since 2018. Much of his coverage has focused on the New York Knicks and Brooklyn Nets, but he has also written extensively about the NBA Draft and draft prospects.